Home

Welcome

About Pier Tsui-Po
My Acupuncture Blog
Subscribe Newsletter

A New Book You'll Enjoy

Reclaim Your Vitality
Tired All The Time
Anti-aging discoveries
What's in the book
Order Book Here

Natural Healing

 Facts, FAQ
Chi Balancing

Improving Health and Wellbeing

Infertility
Stress
Anxiety
Depression
Weight Loss

Relieving Pain

Pain Relief
Arthritis
Neck Pain
Back Pain
Kidney Pain
Gallbladder Pain
Migraine Headaches

Keep In Touch

YOUR Story
Contact Us

Resources

Helpful Links
Privacy Policy
Site Map

[?] Subscribe To This Site

XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines

True Acupuncture Works Better than Sham, Fake or No Acup at all - Migraines and Tension Headaches Research Reviews

Regarding the efficacy of acupuncture, there are curently an increased number of professionals - not fully trained Registered Acupuncturists - who are engaging in the practice of acupuncture without the use of needles. This technique, which is often referred to as dry needling or another term, resembles acupuncture, but it is NOT true acupuncture.

Due to the increased number of enquiries about the safety and effectiveness of this recently new technique, I have taken the liberty to reproduce a Media Release that was published by the Australian Acupuncture and Chinese Medicine Association (AACMA) in January 2009 following reports about Sham versus True acupuncture.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Research shows that true acupuncture works and is more effective than fake or no acupuncture. Reports that it does not matter where acupuncture is applied or that acu-point location is not important are misinformed and misleading.

Two recent Cochrane Reviews (Acupuncture for Tension-Type Headache and Acupuncture for Migraine Prophylaxis) came out strongly in support of the use of acupuncture for migraine and tension-type headaches.

Tension-Type Headaches Review

The reviewers found that '. . . acupuncture could be a valuable non-pharmacological tool in patients with frequent episodic or chronic tension-type headaches.'

Where acupuncture was compared with routine care, the tension headache trials found 'statistically significant and clinically relevant short-term (up to 3 months) benefits of acupuncture over control for response, number of headache days and pain intensity. Long-term effects (beyond 3 months) were not investigated. Six trials compared acupuncture with a sham acupuncture intervention . . . and statistically significant benefits of acupuncture over sham were found. . ."

Migraine Review

Similarly, the reviewers found that 'there is consistent evidence that acupuncture provides additional benefit to treatment of acute migraine attacks only or to routine care (and that) acupuncture is at least as effective as, or possibly more effective than, prophylactic drug treatment, and has fewer adverse effects'. The reviewers recommended that acupuncture should be considered a treatment option.

Sham or true acupuncture

The AACMA disputes the assertion that 'fake' or 'sham' acupuncture is as good as 'true' acupuncture and that it does not matter where the needles are inserted.

In the migraine review, it was reported the variability of treatment and sham interventions meant that any results comparing 'true' acupuncture to 'sham' acupuncture should be interpreted with caution. In contrast, the tension headache review found statistically significant benefits of acupuncture over sham.

The use of 'sham' acupuncture as a control has major limitations, not least which is that the 'sham' treatment is not an inert intervention - it is an active intervention.

Firstly, in 'double blinded' acupuncture research, patients in a 'sham' control group are given treatment that is intended to simulate the sensation of acupuncture. This may involve the non-invasive stimulation of 'true' acupuncture points or the insertion of needles close to the 'true' acu-point. Simulation of a point without inserting a needle does result in a therapeutic effect.

Similarly, as needle insertion involves both angle and depth, the actual site of the 'true acupuncture may be inadvertently stimulated using 'sham' treatment. If the 'sham' points are at a distance from the "true” points, those ‘sham’ points may well have a therapeutic effect in their own right.

The second issue is that 'true’ acupuncture involves individualised treatment designed to treat the patient’s actual condition. Acupuncture is not "one size fits all’ intervention. The formulaic approach used in a lot of acupuncture research to date, in which all patients in the trial receive the same active intervention, is not the way patients are treated with acupuncture in the clinical setting. This means that results will vary according to whether the formula used was appropriate to the individual trial participant and may mean that some active interventions may be comparing 'sham' treatment with another 'sham' control, both of which may be active interventions.

The third issue is that the quality of treatment being provided in some trials may not be indicative of what is actually happening in clinical practice, such as poor choice of formula.

The final issue is whether the acu-point location was accurate or matched the standard location of the acu-point.

In order to avoid the errors and inconsistencies that may result from using varying locations of the one acu-point, the World Health Organization Western Pacific Regional Office published Standard Acupuncture Point Locations in 2008. This text will enable researchers to have a point of reference on the standard acu-point location and allow for more accurate reporting if a non-standard location is used in a clinical trial.

This could explain why the results in some acupuncture clinical trials and meta-analyses show response rates below what qualified practitioners find in actual practice.

It underscore the importance of standards of education and training in acupuncture, not only for practitioners, but also for individuals undertaking research into this field.AACMA supports research that is of a high quality and which provides information that is relevant to and can inform practice. Poorly designed research will lead to poor results and misinformation to the public and others abour the clinical effectiveness of acupuncture.

Clinical trials using acupuncture should conform to STRICTA (Standards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trials of Acupuncture) which can be accessed at www.stricta.info

To obtain acupuncture treatment from a qualified acupuncturist, contact the AACMA practitioner referral service on 1300 725 334 (Australia).

If you live in Victoria Australia and would like to start a course of treatment for your tension headaches or migraines, please telephone our Berwick clinic on 9796 2388 or email us through this contact-us form

Enquiries and further information Ms Jazz Tyrril-Smart; Manager, AACMA Marketing, Events and Professional Development publications@acupuncture.org.au

Back to Acupuncture Migraine Headaches

Return to Acupuncture-and-you Home Page


footer for acupuncture page